trust-4760282_1280

The complexity of defining and navigating trust and our perceptions of trust, especially in times of crisis, is a dominant and much debated theme of our times. Trust as a society, as part of communities and as individuals, trust in government and large institutions, and the corresponding uncertainty a lack of trust generates, is explored and compared in a number of ways in Griffith Review 67: Matters of Trust.

The debate around who we trust, what we trust and how we trust also is reflected in research. The following is a snapshot of open access research, held in Griffith Research Online, informing the debate around trust:

Building trust and establishing legitimacy across scientific, water management and Indigenous cultures (2019)
http://hdl.handle.net/10072/382605

A Trust Framework for Online Research Data Services (2017)
http://hdl.handle.net/10072/339445

Policing and collective efficacy: the relative importance of police effectiveness, procedural justice and the obligation to obey police (2017)
http://hdl.handle.net/10072/173027

Challenges for community engagement: An Australian perspective (2015)
http://hdl.handle.net/10072/105750

Understanding the Role of Trust in Network-Based Responses to Disaster Management and Climate Change Adaptation in the Asia-Pacific Region (2015)
http://hdl.handle.net/10072/141709

But why do we need politicians? A critical review (2014)
http://hdl.handle.net/10072/67563

Is whistle-blowing now mandatory? The impact of mandatory reporting law on trust relationships in healthcare (2013)
http://hdl.handle.net/10072/59855

An Examination of the Role of Emotions in Trust and Control (2012)
http://hdl.handle.net/10072/366921

Trust, Journalism and Communities in a Crisis: Relationships between Media and Emergency Managers (2011)
http://hdl.handle.net/10072/365992

Conceptualising Citizen’s Trust in e-Government: Application of Q Methodology (2009)
http://hdl.handle.net/10072/30823