SARA E DAVIES AND JACQUI TRUE |

In late January, President Donald Trump announced the formation of a Coronavirus Task Force, made up of 12 senior officials who would be responsible for leading the US response to COVID-19. All were men. On February 29, Vice President Mike Pence, the head of the task force, posted a now infamous photo to his Twitter account of a “very productive meeting,” with more than a dozen men and no women sitting around a table in the White House’s Situation Room. By early March, two women had been appointed to the team: Deborah Birx, who took the high-profile role of response coordinator, and Seema Verma, the administrator for Medicare and Medicaid. But throughout January and most of February, the most crucial early period of the US response to COVID-19, only men were part of the Trump administration’s decision-making team.

The reluctance to include even a minority of women in high-level roles is an all-too common pattern, from corporate board rooms to peace negotiations. In the health care sector—as in politics, business and the military—men dominate leadership positions. Just over 10 per cent of countries are led by a woman today

Please click here to read the full “The importance of gender inclusion in COVID-19 responses” article published at Word Politics Review, written by Griffith Asia Institute researcher Professor Sara Davies and Professor Jacqui True (Monash University)