Griffith University

Blogs Griffith Asia Insights

Do personal climate actions distract from bigger climate solutions? New research suggests they don’t.

OMID GHASEMI, KARLIEN PAAS, GRAHAM BRADLEY, CHARLIE RANSOM, SAMEER DESHPANDE AND BEN NEWELL  | 

For years, climate researchers and policymakers have debated an important question: does encouraging people to recycle, eat less meat or drive less make them more likely to support broader climate action—or does it create a false sense that they’ve “done enough”?

New research from Griffith University and the University of New South Wales provides reassuring evidence that personal climate actions do not come at the expense of supporting larger systemic change.

Analysing four years of data (2021 onwards) from almost 2,800 Australians, the study found that people who regularly take individual climate actions are also more likely to support climate policies and participate in collective climate action. Rather than competing with each other, personal and collective action appear to go hand in hand.

Testing a long-running debate

Critics have argued that focusing on individual behaviours—such as reducing household energy use, recycling or choosing sustainable transport—may shift attention away from the larger changes needed from governments, industries and institutions.

This idea, known as the “crowding-out effect”, suggests that personal action might reduce public support for policies such as carbon pricing, renewable energy investment or environmental regulation.

Until now, evidence has been mixed, with most studies examining only short timeframes or relying on single surveys. This study took a different approach by following the same Australians annually between 2021 and 2024, allowing researchers to explore how attitudes and behaviours changed over time.

Individual action and collective action reinforce each other

The results paint a clear picture.

People who reported taking more everyday climate actions also consistently reported greater involvement in collective climate activities, such as participating in environmental campaigns or supporting community initiatives. They also expressed slightly stronger support for climate-related public policies.

Importantly, the researchers found no evidence that personal climate actions reduced support for broader climate solutions. Instead, the findings challenge the idea that encouraging individual behaviour distracts people from advocating for systemic change.

Motivation matters

The study also explored why some people are more likely than others to extend their climate engagement beyond their own households.

Three factors emerged as particularly important:

  • Climate risk perception – believing climate change poses a serious threat.
  • Personal efficacy – believing individual actions can make a difference.
  • Personal norms – feeling a moral responsibility to act.

People with higher levels of these characteristics were especially likely to translate their personal climate actions into broader collective engagement.

Personal action isn’t enough—but it still matters

While the study found no evidence that personal actions undermine broader engagement, it also cautions against viewing individual behaviour as a complete solution.

Climate change requires coordinated action across governments, businesses and communities. Individual actions can help build public momentum, demonstrate community demand and encourage support for larger structural reforms—but they cannot replace systemic policy and institutional change.

The findings suggest that personal and systemic approaches should be seen as complementary rather than competing strategies. Encouraging people to act in their daily lives can sit alongside ambitious climate policies without reducing support for either.

A more positive message for climate communication

For researchers, governments and organisations promoting sustainable behaviour, the findings offer an encouraging message.

Campaigns that encourage individuals to take meaningful climate action need not worry about discouraging support for larger-scale solutions. Instead, they can frame personal behaviour as one important part of a broader societal response—one that works alongside policy reform, infrastructure investment and institutional change.

In short, choosing sustainable options in everyday life doesn’t appear to make people less likely to support bigger climate solutions. If anything, people who act personally are also more likely to engage collectively, reinforcing the idea that tackling climate change requires action at every level of society.

AUTHOR

Dr Omid Ghasemi,  Dr Charlie A. Ransom and Professor Ben R. Newell (UNSW Institute for Climate Risk & Response) and Dr Karlien H. W. Paas and Professor Graham L. Bradley (Griffith University Climate Action Beacon) and Associate Professor Sameer Deshpande (Griffith Climate Action Member Co-Lead and member of the Griffith Asia Institute).

This article is a synopsis of the journal article: Ghasemi, O., Paas, K.H.W., Bradley, G.L. et al. Personal climate actions do not crowd out collective action and policy support: longitudinal evidence. npj Clim. Action 5, 62 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-026-00405-y